Riesgo Nuclear en Perú: Yanangio 1999
Yanangio Nuclear power station accident, Perú - 1999
El 20 de Febrero de 1999, un soldador, trabajando con un tecnólogo radiólogo en una planta hidroeléctrica, tomó una fuente radiactiva industrial de iridio-192, accidentalmente perdida. El soldador puso en su bolsillo durante varias horas el material radiactivo. Después de seis horas, el trabajador comenzó a experimentar dolor en la parte posterior del muslo derecho. Se fue a su casa con la fuente, provocando exposiciones menores entre los miembros de su familia. El tecnólogo radiólogo, tras percatarse cerca de la medianoche de que la fuente radiactiva había desaparecido , llegó a la casa del soldador a la 1:00 am del 21 de febrero y ayudó a descubrir la fuente. El soldador recibió una dosis radiactiva en todo el cuerpo estimada en 150 rem, aunque las dosis localizada eran mucho más altas - hasta de 10,000 rad en una nalga - el tratamiento requirió la amputación de una pierna.
IAEA description: Incident with radiography source resulting in severe radiation burns. level: 3
www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?dsrcid=576709
- capital small highlight
DESPUES DE LA LECTURA DE ESTE INFORME
A MUY POCAS PERSONAS LES QUEDARÁ DUDAS SOBRE LA CADENA DE NEGLIGENCIAS NUCLEARES QUE SE EVIDENCIARON EN 1999 EN LA HIDROELECTRICA DE YANANGIO ... LA EMERGENCIA NUCLEAR DE YANANGIO ESTA CONSIDERADA UNA DE LAS 30 MÁS GRAVES DEL MUNDO EN LOS ÚLTIMOS 50 AÑOS ... OTRA VEZ EL PERÚ FIGURA ENTRE LOS PRIMEROS ...
¿ESTA PERÚ PREPARADO PARA CENTRALES NUCLEARES? ... UN TÉCNICO OLVIDA EL MATERIAL RADIACTIVO EN UNA TUBERÍA POR AHÍ ... OTRO TÉCNICO "SE LO ENCUENTRA" Y SIN DECIR NADA SE LO EMBOLSICA ....
.www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
.www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
Chronology of the incident in brief
Welder
4:00 pm: A worker (welder) finds the source of gammagraphy (192 Ir) abandoned in a water pipe. He puts it in the back pocket of his trousers. He works for six hours with the source in his pocket and his assistant nearby
10:00 pm: He leaves work, takes a bus and travels home (he felt little pain in his right leg). During his return, he travelled for 30 minutes with 15 people. He thinks that the red skin is due to an insect sting. His wife sat on the trousers for 10 minutes to feed their baby. Two kids slept nearby.
11:00 pm: The welder, takes the trousers off the room.
Operator
10:30 pm: The operator makes a gammagraphy. The radiation detector doesn’t detect any readings. He assumes the equipment is not working well and stop to have dinner.
00:00 am: He enters the water pipe, checks the gammagraphy equipment and finds the no screws nor radioactive source. They start looking for the source.
1:00 am: They find the welder in his house (February 21st). He gets out with the source in his hands. The operator hits the welders hand, throws the source to the street and puts a stone to cover it. The source is recovered and secured in a container with iron walls 2” thick.
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
What Went Wrong? - Lesson Learnt
Organisation
- Procedures were not implemented.
- Absence of Safety Culture in the Company’s Management.
- Source inspection and measures were inadequate.
- Lack of training and qualification of the operators.
National Authorities
The evaluation of the authorisations and inspections should be developed by an experienced and trained team.
Equipment Manufacturers/Suppliers
Radiography cameras need to be designed and constructed in a way that prevents unauthorized access to the radioactive source.
Medical Community
Amputated tissue from highly exposed persons can provide an additional source of dose information that could help in the subsequent treatment of the patient. Care needs to be taken to ensure that such samples are kept until it is certain that they are no longer required.
References:
• IAEA, August 2000, The Radiological Accident in Yanago, IAEA (Vienna, Austria), on line at IAEA [http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1101_web.pdf].
• UNSCEAR, 2000, "Annex E: Occupational radiation exposures," in Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, Volume I: Sources, UNSCEAR, on line at UNSCEAR [http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/annexe.pdf].
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
¿Qué salió mal en Yanangio? - Lecciones aprendidas
Organización
- Los procedimientos de trabajo con Fuentes Radiactivas no se implementaron.
- Ausencia de cultura de la seguridad en la gestión de Fuentes Radiactivas de la Compañía.
- Inspección de Fuentes Radiactivas y medidas de manipulación de Fuentes Radiactivas inadecuadas.
- Falta de formación, entrenamiento y calificación de los operadores de Fuentes Radiactivas.
Autoridades Nacionales
La evaluación de las autorizaciones y las inspecciones deben ser desarrolladas por un equipo experimentado y capacitado en Fuentes Radiactivas.
Fabricantes de Equipos / Proveedores
Las cámaras de radiografía deben ser diseñadas y construidas de manera que impidan el acceso no autorizado a la fuente radiactiva.
Médico de la Comunidad
El tejido amputado de las personas altamente expuestas a radioactividad puede proporcionar una fuente adicional de información sobre la dosis de exposición, que podrían ayudar en el tratamiento posterior de los pacientes. Se necesita tomar medidas de conservación de tales muestras, que aseguren tenerlas a mano, mientras sean necesarias.
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
www.asiainspectioncommunity.com/yanango-radio...
------------------------------------------------------------------
Riesgo Nuclear en Perú: Yanangio 1999
Riesgo Nuclear en Perú:
Yanangio 1999 - the hydroelectric plant at Yanango.San Román, Department of Junín.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Yanango orphaned source, 1999
compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston
last modified 11 June 2006
Date: 20 February 1999
Location: Yanango, Peru
Type of event: lost source
Description:
A welder working with a radiographer at a hydroelectric plant picked up a lost iridium-192 industrial radiography source on 20 Feburary 1999 and put it in his pocket for several hours. After about six hours the worker began experiencing pain in the back of the right thigh. He went home with the source, causing minor exposures to family members. The radiographer, having discovered the source was missing about midnight, came to the welder's home at 1:00 AM on 21 February and helped discover the source. The welder received an estimated whole body dose of 150 rem, although localized doses were much higher--up to 10,000 rad to one buttock--requiring amputation of one leg.
Consequences: 1 injury.
References:
IAEA, August 2000, The Radiological Accident in Yanago, IAEA (Vienna, Austria), on line at IAEA [http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1101_web.pdf].
UNSCEAR, 2000, "Annex E: Occupational radiation exposures," in Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, Volume I: Sources, UNSCEAR, on line at UNSCEAR [http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/annexe.pdf].
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/radevents/1999PER1.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear power station accidents
Year
Incident
INES level
Country
Location
IAEA description
Picture url
2011
Fukushima
5
Japan
37.319444, 141.021111
Reactor shutdown after the 2011 Sendai earthquake and tsunami; failure of emergency cooling caused an explosion
capital_small_highlight
2011
Onagawa
Japan
38.401111, 141.499722
Reactor shutdown after the 2011 Sendai earthquake and tsunami caused a fire
capital_small_highlight
2006
Fleurus
4
Belgium
Fleurus, Belgium
Severe health effects for a worker at a commercial irradiation facility as a result of high doses of radiation
capital_small_highlight
2006
Forsmark
2
Sweden
60.403333, 18.166667
Degraded safety functions for common cause failure in the emergency power supply system at nuclear power plant
capital_small_highlight
2006
Erwin
US
36.145, -82.410833
Thirty-five litres of a highly enriched uranium solution leaked during transfer
capital_small_highlight
2005
Sellafield
3
UK
54.4205, -3.4975
Release of large quantity of radioactive material, contained within the installation
capital_small_highlight
2005
Atucha
2
Argentina
-33.967519, -59.205119
Overexposure of a worker at a power reactor exceeding the annual limit
capital_small_highlight
2005
Braidwood
US
41.243611, -88.229167
Nuclear material leak
capital_small_highlight
2003
Paks
3
Hungary
46.5725, 18.854167
Partially spent fuel rods undergoing cleaning in a tank of heavy water ruptured and spilled fuel pellets
capital_small_highlight
1999
Tokaimura
4
Japan
36.4667, 140.5667
Fatal overexposures of workers following a criticality event at a nuclear facility
capital_small_highlight
1999
Yanangio
3
Peru
Latitude -11.2156 Longitude -75.4853
Incident with radiography source resulting in severe radiation burns
capital_small_highlight
1999
Ikitelli
3
Turkey
41.0792, 28.7825
Loss of a highly radioactive Co-60 source
capital_small_highlight
1999
Ishikawa
2
Japan
37.061111, 136.726389
Control rod malfunction
capital_small_highlight
1993
Tomsk
4
Russia
56.5, 84.966667
Pressure buildup led to an explosive mechanical failure
capital_small_highlight
1993
Cadarache
2
France
Cadarache, France
Spread of contamination to an area not expected by design
capital_small_highlight
1989
Vandellos
3
Spain
40.951389, 0.866667
Near accident caused by fire resulting in loss of safety systems at the nuclear power station
capital_small_highlight
1989
Greifswald
Germany
54.140586, 13.664422
Excessive heating which damaged ten fuel rods
capital_small_highlight
1987
Goilnia
5
Brazil
-16.6746, -49.2641
Four people died and six received doses of a few Gy from an abandoned and ruptured highly radioactive Cs-137 source
capital_small_highlight
1986
Chernobyl
7
Russia
51.389553, 30.099147
Widespread health and environmental effects. External release of a significant fraction of reactor core inventory
capital_small_highlight
1986
Hamm-Uentrop
Germany
51.679167, 7.971667
Spherical fuel pebble became lodged in the pipe used to deliver fuel elements to the reactor
capital_small_highlight
1981
Tsuraga
2
Japan
35.672778, 136.0775
More than 100 workers were exposed to doses of up to 155 millirem per day radiation
capital_small_highlight
1980
Saint Laurent des Eaux
4
France
Saint Laurent des Eaux, France
Melting of one channel of fuel in the reactor with no release outside the site
capital_small_highlight
1979
Three Mile Island
5
US
40.153889, -76.724722
Severe damage to the reactor core
capital_small_highlight
1977
Jaslovsk Bohunice
4
Czechoslovakia
48.476111, 17.65
Damaged fuel integrity, extensive corrosion damage of fuel cladding and release of radioactivity
capital_small_highlight
1967
Chapelcross
UK
55.01566, -3.22605
Graphite debris partially blocked a fuel channel causing a fuel element to melt and catch fire
capital_small_highlight
1966
Monroe
US
41.889167, -83.345556
Sodium cooling system malfunction
capital_small_highlight
1964
Charlestown
US
�Lat: 41.44N, Lon: 71.69W
Error by a worker at a United Nuclear Corporation fuel facility led to an accidental criticality
capital_small_highlight
1959
Santa Susana Field Laboratory
US
Santa Susana Field Laboratory, California
Partial core meltdown
capital_small_highlight
1958
Chalk River
Canada
Chalk River Nuclear Labs Chalk River, Ontario Canada K0J 1J0
Due to inadequate cooling a damaged uranium fuel rod caught fire and was torn in two
capital_small_highlight
1958
Vinca
Yugoslavia
Vin_a belgrade serbia
During a subcritical counting experiment a power buildup went undetected - six scientists received high doses
capital_small_highlight
1957
Kyshtym
6
Russia
Mayak, Russia
Significant release of radioactive material to the environment from explosion of a high activity waste tank.
capital_small_highlight
1957
Windscale Pile
5
UK
Sellafield, Cumbria UK
Release of radioactive material to the environment following a fire in a reactor core
capital_small_highlight
1952
Chalk River
5
Canada
Chalk River Nuclear Labs Chalk River, Ontario Canada K0J 1J0
A reactor shutoff rod failure, combined with several operator errors, led to a major power excursion of more than double the reactor's rated output at AECL's NRX reactor
capital_small_highlight
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Hidroeléctrica Yanango (también conocida internacionalmente como Yanangio) lugar de la tragedia por exposición a radioactividad en 1999.